
BMP testingEnergy crops and whole-crop plants (WCS)single study (18 samples)
Pennisetum hybrid grass — BMP: 18 studies, weighted mean 266 m³ CH₄/t VS
Hybrid pennisetum (a P. americanum × P. purpureum hybrid) is a tropical grass with a very high yield, studied in China. The records concern the fractions of stems, leaves and the whole plant.
rating: neutralCH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)
Photo John Robert McPherson / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping
- Weighted mean
- 266m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 194–361m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 18single study (18 samples)
- Publications
- 1source
- Temperatures
- 35 °Cof the test
Methane in biogas
Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (protein from total nitrogen (N 1 % DM × 6.25)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it
Potential per tonne of fresh matter: moderate (40 m³ CH₄/t); no particular threats to stability. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer.
Why? Rating factors
Potential per tonne +1
- +1potential 40 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 266 × DM 17.5 % × VS 85.2 %)
Process stability 0
- 0no factors
Handling and costs −0.5
- −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing
Total points: 0.5 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 18 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (266); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Show the remaining records in the legend (6)
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 1 DOI | 194 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass stem | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 2 DOI | 200 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 3 DOI | 226 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 4 DOI | 233 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass stem | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 5 DOI | 236 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 6 DOI | 238 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 7 DOI | 241 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 8 DOI | 256 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 9 DOI | 258 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 10 DOI | 263 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 11 DOI | 270 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 12 DOI | 276 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 13 DOI | 277 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage stem | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 14 DOI | 284 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid fresh grass stem | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 15 DOI | 298 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage stem | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 16 DOI | 316 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage leaf | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 17 DOI | 356 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage whole | end point (model curve) |
| Zhang et al. (2019) · 18 DOI | 361 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Pennisetum hybrid grass silage stem | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 266 | arithmetic mean 266, SD 46 | ||
Typical composition
- Dry matter (DM)
- 17.5% (range 10.6–28.5)
- Volatile solids (VS)
- 85.2 % DM (range 80.4–92)
- Nitrogen
- 1 % DM
- C/N ratio
- 42.3
Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 18 determinations, volatile solids: 17 determinations. C/N was calculated as the ratio of C and N content (% DM) from the same source.
Sources: Zhang et al. (2019).
The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.
Process properties
Advantages
- Methane potential in the database: weighted mean 266 m³ CH₄/t VS (median 261; range 194–361; 18 records from 1 sources).
- The hybrid P. americanum x P. purpureum studied with regard to plant height and ensiling (Zhang 2019).
Drawbacks and risks
- Yield depends on the height of the plant at harvest (Zhang 2019).
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
group: Animal excreta (slurry, manure, poultry litter)
Co-digestion with excreta (slurry/solid manure) is the standard arrangement for plant biomass: they supply alkalinity and microflora.[1][2]
Dosing
Sources of the process data
- Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Kang, X.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Xing, T.; Lin, R. (2019) Improving methane production from Pennisetum hybrid by monitoring plant height and ensiling pretreatment. Renewable Energy 141, 57–63
- Weiland, P. (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Hendriks, A.T.W.M.; Zeeman, G. (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Hybrid pennisetum is a hybrid of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum, today also Cenchrus americanus) and elephant grass (P. purpureum). It was bred as a plant with very high biomass production and is grown in the warm zone, including in China. The compilation covers several records from one publication in which fresh matter was examined in different fractions: stems, leaves and the whole plant, in several variants of the experiment.
Properties relevant to digestion
The biomass of this hybrid consists mainly of stems rich in cellulose and hemicelluloses, while the leaves are more digestible. The lignin share rises with the age of the plant, which slows hydrolysis. The green mass is moist and spoils quickly, so it must be ensiled quickly or fed to the digester. Typical of C4 grasses are low protein and a high C/N ratio, so it is beneficial to combine it with a nitrogen-rich substrate. The fibre requires size reduction, because without it a floating crust forms. The plant does not tolerate frost, which limits cultivation.
How to read the spread of results
All records come from one study, so the spread does not include differences between laboratories, only between fractions and variants within the experiment. Stems and leaves have different digestibility, and their proportion in the whole plant changes with age. The harvest date, fertilisation, cutting height and sample preparation also have an effect. The description of the records refers to fresh matter, so the results should not be applied directly to silage. Test parameters, such as the inoculum and the S/I ratio, are common here to the whole series.
In biogas plant practice
Under Polish conditions hybrid pennisetum is not available as a local substrate. In countries where it is grown it is used in cyclical harvests, and the biomass is ensiled and mixed with other substrates. Feeding requires size reduction and good mixing. Because all the data come from one study, conclusions about behaviour in other conditions must be formulated cautiously and confirmed with a BMP test on local material. In interpreting the fraction results it must be remembered that in practice a biogas plant receives the whole plant, not stems and leaves separately, so the record for the whole plant is the closest to a real feed. The fraction records show rather where the difference in digestibility within a single plant comes from.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.085 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Kang, X.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Xing, T.; Lin, R. (2019). Improving methane production from Pennisetum hybrid by monitoring plant height and ensiling pretreatment. Renewable Energy 141, 57–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.084 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





