BMP testingGrain, bran, feed and fodder

Wheat bran — BMP: 2 studies, weighted mean 330 m³ CH₄/t VS

Wheat bran is a by-product of grain milling, rich in fibre, residual starch and protein. The compilation is based on a small number of records from several studies.

rating: very goodCH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo Rasbak / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 3.0, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
330m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
330–330m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
2studies
Publications
2sources
Temperatures
36 °C, 38 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

very good — editorial rating for biogas plantsWorth accepting even for free or with a payment to the supplier

Potential per tonne of fresh matter: very high (263 m³ CH₄/t); no particular threats to stability. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer.

Why? Rating factors

Potential per tonne +3

  • +3potential 263 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 330 × DM 86.9 % × VS 91.8 %)

Process stability 0

  • 0no factors

Handling and costs −0.5

  • −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing

Total points: 2.5 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.

Editorial rating per the methodology · confidence of the rating: low · excluding market prices

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 2 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: Wheat branCumulative methane production over time for 2 records and the weighted mean of 330 m³ CH₄/t VS. 2 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).0100200300400051015202530time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSKolbl et al. (2014): 330 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Luna-delRisco et al. (2011): 330 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean330

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (330); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Kolbl et al. (2014) DOI33038 °C · mesophilicWheat Branend point (model curve)
Luna-delRisco et al. (2011)33036 °C · mesophilicgrain mill - Branend point (model curve)
Weighted mean330arithmetic mean 330, SD 0

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
86.9% (range 79.4–94.4)
Volatile solids (VS)
91.8 % DM (range 91.4–92.2)

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 2 determinations.

Sources: Kolbl et al. (2014); Luna-delRisco et al. (2011).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • fibrous
  • carbon-rich
  • seasonal
  • editorial classification

Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.

Advantages

  • Methane potential in the database: weighted mean 330 m³ CH₄/t VS (median 330; range 330–330; 2 records from 2 sources).
  • A milling by-product; described in Kolbl 2014 and Lunadelrisco 2011.

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source-based dose limits.

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Wheat bran arises in mills during the milling of grain into flour: it is the outer layers of the kernel together with the germ and remnants of the endosperm. It is used as feed, in food and as an industrial raw material. As a biogas plant substrate it is costly and competes with feed uses. The compilation covers several records from several studies: wheat bran and bran from a grain mill, under mesophilic conditions.

Properties relevant to digestion

Bran has a lot of dietary fibre (cellulose, hemicellulose, arabinoxylans), protein and residual starch and fats. Degradation is faster than for straw because readily available compounds occur alongside the fibre. The material is dry and dusty and needs wetting. A high protein content means ammonia release at high doses. When damp, bran quickly goes mouldy and loses value, which must be monitored during storage. In the digester it can form lumps if it is not mixed well.

How to read the spread of results

The records do not exhaust the variability. The composition of bran depends on the wheat variety, the extraction rate (the more thoroughly the grain is milled, the less starch remains in the bran), granulation and the type of mill. Further factors are the degree of size reduction, the form of the material (loose or pelleted), the inoculum, the substrate-to-inoculum ratio and the test temperature (36 to 38 °C in these studies). Results from different mills can therefore differ significantly.

In biogas plant practice

Bran is a good, readily fermentable supplement, but its feed price usually exceeds its energy value at a biogas plant. It may make sense for batches that are spoiled, damp or fail feed standards. It should be added gradually, monitoring ammonia, and wetted before feeding. Before signing a supply agreement it is worth checking the waste classification and running a BMP test. It should also be taken into account that bran is fine and dusty, so when dosing it care must be taken to limit dust and the risk of dust explosion in the loading areas, in line with the safety rules applicable to bulk materials. Because the compilation contains few records and mills differ in technology, before purchase it is worth testing the specific batch and checking its composition, including starch and fat content, because these determine the rate of digestion. It is also good to agree a fixed product specification with the supplier.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.257 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Kolbl, S.; Paloczi, A.; Panjan, J.; Stres, B. (2014). Addressing case specific biogas plant tasks: Industry oriented methane yields derived from 5L Automatic Methane Potential Test Systems in batch or semi-continuous tests using realistic inocula, substrate particle sizes and organic loading. Bioresource Technology 153, 180–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.010 DOI
  2. Luna-delRisco, M.; Normak, A.; Orupõld, K. (2011). Biochemical methane potential of different organic wastes and energy crops from Estonia. Agronomy Research 9(1–2), 331–342. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25cf2d7bba4758136830a9a02caf3ecd997173bb source

All sources of the site: bibliography.