
BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residues
Bananas (fruit, pulp) — BMP: 6 studies, weighted mean 336 m³ CH₄/t VS
Bananas (fruit, flesh, whole with peel) digest well thanks to starch and sugars; the result depends on ripeness, the share of peel and the test conditions.
Photo Wilfredor / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 3.0, source file; changes: cropping
- Weighted mean
- 336m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 289–367m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 6studies
- Publications
- 4sources
- Temperatures
- 35 °C, 37 °C, 55 °Cof the test
Methane in biogas
Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants
Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 6 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (336); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffiere et al. (2006) DOI | 289 | 55 °C · thermophilic | Banana | end point (model curve) |
| Khan M.T. (2016) · 1 | 349 | 37 °C · mesophilic | Unpeeled banana | end point (model curve) |
| Khan M.T. (2016) · 2 | 367 | 37 °C · mesophilic | Banana flesh | end point (model curve) |
| Kouas et al. (2017) DOI | 361 | 35 °C · mesophilic | banana | end point (model curve) |
| Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 1 DOI | 321 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Fresh ripe banana pulp | end point (model curve) |
| Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 2 DOI | 351 | 35 °C · mesophilic | Rooten banana pulp | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 336 | arithmetic mean 340, SD 29 | ||
Typical composition
- Dry matter (DM)
- 20.4% (range 18–22.9)
Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 0 determinations.
Sources: Sanjaya et al. (2016).
The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.
Process properties
Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.
Advantages
- Methane yield in the compendium: median 350 (range 289-367) m³ CH₄/t VS, 6 records from 4 studies (weighted mean 336).
- The kinetics of methane production from banana waste were modelled in a batch study (Khan M.T. (2016))
Drawbacks and risks
- In the digestion of cassava waste, rich in easily degradable sugars and poor in nitrogen, the literature indicates early inhibition through rapid acidification; an analogous risk applies to other starchy substrates (Ahou et al. (2021))
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
substrates: nitrogen-rich — e.g. Pig slurry, Poultry manure, Waste activated sludge (secondary sludge), Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina
A nitrogen-rich co-substrate balances the low C/N of fruit and vegetable waste (Bouallagui et al. 2009).[1]
- combines well
substrates: high alkalinity (buffer) — e.g. Cattle manure, Pig slurry, Cattle slurry, Duck slurry, Rumen and digestive tract content
Co-digestion of easily degradable substrates with dairy slurry increased the methane yield relative to slurry alone.[2]
Dosing
No source limits on the dose for this substrate.
Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).
Practical requirements
- Shred: the yield depends on particle size (ground banana peels gave more than chopped ones) (Odedina et al. (2017); Sharma et al. (1988))
Sources of the process data
- Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition
- Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates
- Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties
- Batch anaerobic digestion of banana waste - energy potential and modelling of methane production kinetics
- Robust assessment of both biochemical methane potential and degradation kinetics of solid residues in successive batches
- Mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion from fruit fragments
- Lab-scale anaerobic digestion of cassava peels: the first step of energy recovery from cassava waste and water hyacinth
- Effects of size and thermophilic pre-hydrolysis of banana peel during anaerobic digestion, and biomethanation potential of key tropical fruit wastes
- Effect of particle size on biogas generation from biomass residues
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Bananas are grown in the tropical zone, and reach Poland as imports. Banana waste therefore arises in ripening rooms, wholesale markets and shops (overripe, damaged fruit), and in the growing countries also on plantations and in processing (peels, rejects). The dataset contains samples of fresh and spoiled flesh, whole fruit with peel and fruit with no description, tested mainly at mesophilic temperature and one test at thermophilic temperature.
Properties relevant to digestion
The flesh of a ripe banana contains a lot of readily available sugars (sucrose, glucose, fructose), and that of an unripe one mainly starch, so degradation is rapid and requires careful dosing to avoid acidification. The peel contains more fibre, lignin and polyphenols, and its share reduces digestibility. Low dry matter and high moisture content make storage difficult, and spoiled fruit loses its readily available sugars more quickly. The protein content is low, so the C/N ratio is high relative to meat waste.
How to read the spread of results
The records differ in the part of the fruit (flesh, peel, whole fruit), ripeness and degree of spoilage, and also in variety. Size reduction, temperature (the dataset also includes thermophilic tests), inoculum, the substrate-to-inoculum ratio and test length are significant. Results for flesh will differ from those for whole fruit with peel, and the dataset combines these variants in a single substrate.
In biogas plant practice
Banana waste is a valuable co-substrate in a mixture with slurry or nitrogen-rich material. It should be processed quickly, size-reduced and dosed evenly with control of pH and volatile acids. Peels require more thorough size reduction. Fruit waste is usually classified as waste (group 02 or 20), and its acceptance requires installation permits; for imported fruit, additional phytosanitary requirements may apply.
For comparison with domestic fruit such as apples, bananas contain more starch when unripe and fewer organic acids. This affects the initial course of digestion: degradation may be slower at first and then abrupt, which is worth taking into account in dosing.
Because the dataset is small, it is best to confirm the result with your own BMP test on the specific batch.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Buffiere, P.; Loisel, D.; Bernet, N.; Delgenes, J.P. (2006). Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Science and Technology 53(8), 233–241. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.254 DOI
- Khan M.T., Brule M., Maurer C., Argyropoulos D., Muller J., Oechsner H. (2016). Batch anaerobic digestion of banana waste - energy potential and modelling of methane production kinetics. AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal 18(1). https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/download/3244/2288 source
- Kouas, M.; Torrijos, M.; Sousbie, P.; Steyer, J.P.; Sayadi, S.; Harmand, J. (2017). Robust assessment of both biochemical methane potential and degradation kinetics of solid residues in successive batches. Waste Management 70, 59–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.001 DOI
- Sanjaya, A.P.; Cahyanto, M.N.; Millati, R. (2016). Mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion from fruit fragments. Renewable Energy 98, 135–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.059 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





