BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residues

Bananas (fruit, pulp) — BMP: 6 studies, weighted mean 336 m³ CH₄/t VS

Bananas (fruit, flesh, whole with peel) digest well thanks to starch and sugars; the result depends on ripeness, the share of peel and the test conditions.

CH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo Wilfredor / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 3.0, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
336m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
289–367m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
6studies
Publications
4sources
Temperatures
35 °C, 37 °C, 55 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants

Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.

Editorial rating per the methodology

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 6 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: Bananas (fruit, pulp)Cumulative methane production over time for 6 records and the weighted mean of 336 m³ CH₄/t VS. 6 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).0100200300400051015202530time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSBuffiere et al. (2006): 289 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Khan M.T. (2016) · 1: 349 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Khan M.T. (2016) · 2: 367 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Kouas et al. (2017): 361 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 1: 321 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 2: 351 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean336

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (336); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Buffiere et al. (2006) DOI28955 °C · thermophilicBananaend point (model curve)
Khan M.T. (2016) · 134937 °C · mesophilicUnpeeled bananaend point (model curve)
Khan M.T. (2016) · 236737 °C · mesophilicBanana fleshend point (model curve)
Kouas et al. (2017) DOI36135 °C · mesophilicbananaend point (model curve)
Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 1 DOI32135 °C · mesophilicFresh ripe banana pulpend point (model curve)
Sanjaya et al. (2016) · 2 DOI35135 °C · mesophilicRooten banana pulpend point (model curve)
Weighted mean336arithmetic mean 340, SD 29

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
20.4% (range 18–22.9)

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 0 determinations.

Sources: Sanjaya et al. (2016).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • easily degradable
  • carbon-rich
  • low in nitrogen
  • poor in trace elements
  • seasonal
  • acidic
  • editorial classification

Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.

Advantages

  • Methane yield in the compendium: median 350 (range 289-367) m³ CH₄/t VS, 6 records from 4 studies (weighted mean 336).
  • The kinetics of methane production from banana waste were modelled in a batch study (Khan M.T. (2016))

Drawbacks and risks

  • In the digestion of cassava waste, rich in easily degradable sugars and poor in nitrogen, the literature indicates early inhibition through rapid acidification; an analogous risk applies to other starchy substrates (Ahou et al. (2021))

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source limits on the dose for this substrate.

Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).

Practical requirements

  • Shred: the yield depends on particle size (ground banana peels gave more than chopped ones) (Odedina et al. (2017); Sharma et al. (1988))

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Bananas are grown in the tropical zone, and reach Poland as imports. Banana waste therefore arises in ripening rooms, wholesale markets and shops (overripe, damaged fruit), and in the growing countries also on plantations and in processing (peels, rejects). The dataset contains samples of fresh and spoiled flesh, whole fruit with peel and fruit with no description, tested mainly at mesophilic temperature and one test at thermophilic temperature.

Properties relevant to digestion

The flesh of a ripe banana contains a lot of readily available sugars (sucrose, glucose, fructose), and that of an unripe one mainly starch, so degradation is rapid and requires careful dosing to avoid acidification. The peel contains more fibre, lignin and polyphenols, and its share reduces digestibility. Low dry matter and high moisture content make storage difficult, and spoiled fruit loses its readily available sugars more quickly. The protein content is low, so the C/N ratio is high relative to meat waste.

How to read the spread of results

The records differ in the part of the fruit (flesh, peel, whole fruit), ripeness and degree of spoilage, and also in variety. Size reduction, temperature (the dataset also includes thermophilic tests), inoculum, the substrate-to-inoculum ratio and test length are significant. Results for flesh will differ from those for whole fruit with peel, and the dataset combines these variants in a single substrate.

In biogas plant practice

Banana waste is a valuable co-substrate in a mixture with slurry or nitrogen-rich material. It should be processed quickly, size-reduced and dosed evenly with control of pH and volatile acids. Peels require more thorough size reduction. Fruit waste is usually classified as waste (group 02 or 20), and its acceptance requires installation permits; for imported fruit, additional phytosanitary requirements may apply.

For comparison with domestic fruit such as apples, bananas contain more starch when unripe and fewer organic acids. This affects the initial course of digestion: degradation may be slower at first and then abrupt, which is worth taking into account in dosing.

Because the dataset is small, it is best to confirm the result with your own BMP test on the specific batch.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Buffiere, P.; Loisel, D.; Bernet, N.; Delgenes, J.P. (2006). Towards new indicators for the prediction of solid waste anaerobic digestion properties. Water Science and Technology 53(8), 233–241. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.254 DOI
  2. Khan M.T., Brule M., Maurer C., Argyropoulos D., Muller J., Oechsner H. (2016). Batch anaerobic digestion of banana waste - energy potential and modelling of methane production kinetics. AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal 18(1). https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/download/3244/2288 source
  3. Kouas, M.; Torrijos, M.; Sousbie, P.; Steyer, J.P.; Sayadi, S.; Harmand, J. (2017). Robust assessment of both biochemical methane potential and degradation kinetics of solid residues in successive batches. Waste Management 70, 59–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.001 DOI
  4. Sanjaya, A.P.; Cahyanto, M.N.; Millati, R. (2016). Mesophilic batch anaerobic digestion from fruit fragments. Renewable Energy 98, 135–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.059 DOI

All sources of the site: bibliography.