BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residuessingle study (2 samples)

Carrot tops (leaves and petioles) — BMP: 2 studies, weighted mean 275 m³ CH₄/t VS

Carrot tops (leaves and petioles) are a post-harvest residue with a higher fibre content than the root, readily available in the field and in processing plants.

CH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo Kumar gyan prakash / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
275m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
241–309m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
2single study (2 samples)
Publications
1source
Temperatures
35 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants

Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.

Editorial rating per the methodology

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 2 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: Carrot tops (leaves and petioles)Cumulative methane production over time for 2 records and the weighted mean of 275 m³ CH₄/t VS. 2 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).0100200300400051015202530time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSGunaseelan (2004) · 1: 241 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Gunaseelan (2004) · 2: 309 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean275

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (275); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Gunaseelan (2004) · 1 DOI24135 °C · mesophiliccarrot Leavesend point (model curve)
Gunaseelan (2004) · 2 DOI30935 °C · mesophiliccarrot petioleend point (model curve)
Weighted mean275arithmetic mean 275, SD 48

Typical composition

Volatile solids (VS)
92.2 % DM (range 91.3–93.1)

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 0 determinations, volatile solids: 2 determinations. No DM in the sources – the calculator has to ask for a value.

Sources: Gunaseelan (2004).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.

No published process studies

The literature we use does not describe the advantages or drawbacks of digesting this substrate beyond the BMP test results. Below are process characteristics assigned on the basis of the type of material — an editorial classification, not a study result.

dilutes the feed (low DM)
low dry matter, dilutes the feed
seasonal
seasonal availability — requires storage
poor in trace elements
poor in trace elements — mono-digestion requires supplementation
variable composition
high variability of composition between batches
fibrous
lignocellulose, long fibres → floating layer, harder mixing, slow degradation

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source limits on the dose for this substrate.

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Carrot tops are the above-ground part of the plant: leaves and petioles. In large-scale cultivation they usually stay in the field after mechanical harvest, but in bunched-carrot crops and in packing houses handling young carrots they are separated from the roots and treated as waste. The dataset describes leaves and petioles, while the roots are covered in a separate substrate.

Properties relevant to digestion

Green tops contain a lot of water, and in the dry matter fibre (cellulose, hemicellulose), protein and soluble sugars predominate. Petioles are more fibrous than leaf blades, with a greater share of supporting structures. Lignin is moderate and increases with the age of the plant. The tops also contain volatile and phenolic compounds, but these are not a significant inhibitor at typical doses. The leaf protein supplies nitrogen, so the C/N ratio is lower than in woody materials. A significant risk is soil contamination after harvest, which translates into sand in the digester, and the rapid spoilage of fresh matter.

How to read the spread of results

The dataset contains several records from a single study: leaves and petioles, all under mesophilic conditions. The differences between them indicate that the share of the fraction in the batch matters for the result. The result also depends on the harvest date, the age of the leaves, comminution, the method of preservation (fresh, dried) and the inoculum. Because there is a single source, repeatability between laboratories cannot be assessed.

In biogas plant practice

Carrot tops can supplement the feed during the harvest season, especially on farms that grow vegetables themselves. They require shredding and, in larger quantities, ensiling, because fresh matter quickly loses its value. They combine well with slurry, which compensates for the low buffer content of the leaves. With mechanical feeding, care must be taken with fibres that wrap around agitators. Vegetable waste from outside the farm is subject to waste legislation, whereas residues from the farm's own field are used under the rules for agricultural products.

An additional advantage is that carrot tops appear at the same time as the roots, so both materials can be dosed together: the roots supply readily available sugars, and the tops fibre and protein, which evens out the course of digestion.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Gunaseelan, V. (2004). Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 26(4), 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.006 DOI

All sources of the site: bibliography.