
BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residues
Pineapple fruit and leaves — BMP: 2 studies, weighted mean 294 m³ CH₄/t VS
Pineapple as a substrate comprises fruit and leafy shoots from plantations; records from different studies describe a material with high moisture content and an acidic pH.
Photo Daralnoble / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping
- Weighted mean
- 294m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 232–355m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 2studies
- Publications
- 2sources
- Temperatures
- 35 °Cof the test
Methane in biogas
Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants
Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 2 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (294); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gunaseelan (2004) DOI | 355 | 35 °C · mesophilic | pine apple leafy shoot | end point (model curve) |
| Kouas et al. (2017) DOI | 232 | 35 °C · mesophilic | pineapple | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 294 | arithmetic mean 294, SD 87 | ||
Typical composition
- Volatile solids (VS)
- 94.6 % DM (range 94.6–94.6)
Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 0 determinations, volatile solids: 1 determination. No DM in the sources – the calculator has to ask for a value.
Sources: Gunaseelan (2004).
The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.
Process properties
Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.
No published process studies
The literature we use does not describe the advantages or drawbacks of digesting this substrate beyond the BMP test results. Below are process characteristics assigned on the basis of the type of material — an editorial classification, not a study result.
- easily degradable
- sugars, starch, glycerol → fast hydrolysis and acidification (VFA), needs buffering
- acidic
- low pH of the substrate (silages, stillage, whey, fruit)
- dilutes the feed (low DM)
- low dry matter, dilutes the feed
- seasonal
- seasonal availability — requires storage
- poor in trace elements
- poor in trace elements — mono-digestion requires supplementation
- carbon-rich
- high C/N → nitrogen deficiency; combine well with nitrogen-rich substrates
- low in nitrogen
- high C/N → nitrogen deficiency; combine well with nitrogen-rich substrates
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
substrates: nitrogen-rich — e.g. Pig slurry, Poultry manure, Waste activated sludge (secondary sludge), Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina
A nitrogen-rich co-substrate balances the low C/N of fruit and vegetable waste (Bouallagui et al. 2009).[1]
- combines well
substrates: high alkalinity (buffer) — e.g. Cattle manure, Pig slurry, Cattle slurry, Duck slurry, Rumen and digestive tract content
Co-digestion of easily degradable substrates with dairy slurry increased the methane yield relative to slurry alone.[2]
Dosing
No source limits on the dose for this substrate.
Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).
Sources of the process data
- Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition
- Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates
- Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks
- Robust assessment of both biochemical methane potential and degradation kinetics of solid residues in successive batches
- Effects of size and thermophilic pre-hydrolysis of banana peel during anaerobic digestion, and biomethanation potential of key tropical fruit wastes
- Effect of particle size on biogas generation from biomass residues
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Pineapple (Ananas comosus) is a tropical plant grown mainly on plantations in Asia, the Americas and Africa. The dataset contains two materials: fruit and leafy shoots from plantations. The raw material is not grown in Poland; waste arises in the processing of imported fruit (juices, snacks) or in trade.
Properties relevant to digestion
Pineapple flesh contains a lot of simple sugars and water, so it degrades quickly. However, the low pH of the fruit can lead to acidification of the digester at large, sudden doses. The leaves contain cellulose fibres and lignin, and are stiffer and slower to degrade. The peel and crown of the fruit are more woody than the flesh.
How to read the spread of results
The records describe different parts of the plant, so the difference between them is understandable and does not indicate measurement uncertainty. In addition, they come from several different studies. The result is affected by the variety, ripeness, the share of peel and crown, size reduction, moisture content and the inoculum. Results for processing waste will differ from values for whole fruit.
In biogas plant practice
Pineapples in a biogas plant are mainly a topic for producing countries. In Poland they may appear as a component of waste from processing or trade, usually mixed with other fruit waste. Gradual dosing and monitoring of pH and volatile fatty acids are recommended in order to avoid acidification. Leaves and crowns require size reduction, and a raw material with high moisture content is best mixed with drier material.
Because the records come from only a few studies, it is best to treat the pineapple result as a reference point for fruit waste with high moisture content, not as a material constant. For an actual stream of processing waste, it is worth checking the composition (the share of flesh, peel and leaves), because the proportions of these fractions change the result, as do possible preservatives or sugar from syrups.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Gunaseelan, V. (2004). Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy 26(4), 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.08.006 DOI
- Kouas, M.; Torrijos, M.; Sousbie, P.; Steyer, J.P.; Sayadi, S.; Harmand, J. (2017). Robust assessment of both biochemical methane potential and degradation kinetics of solid residues in successive batches. Waste Management 70, 59–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.001 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





