BMP testingGrasses, green forage and fodder plants

Clover — BMP: 5 studies, weighted mean 394 m³ CH₄/t VS

Clover is a leguminous plant of high protein content, grown for feed and as a preceding crop. As a biogas substrate it gives readily digestible biomass, but carries a risk of ammonia.

rating: neutralCH₄ 59 %

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Northeast Region / Wikimedia Commons, public domain, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
394m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
280–558m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
5studies
Publications
2sources
Temperatures
35 °C, 40 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.9 kWh/m³ of biogas

measured mean of 3 studies BMP, range 57.7–62 %; in a batch test the CH₄ share tends to be higher than in a plant.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it

Potential per tonne of fresh matter: high (70 m³ CH₄/t); process risk: protein / nitrogen. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer.

Why? Rating factors

Potential per tonne +2

  • +2potential 70 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 394 × DM 19.4 % × VS 91.5 %)

Process stability −1

  • −1protein / nitrogen: risk of ammonia inhibition at higher shares

Handling and costs −0.5

  • −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing

Total points: 0.5 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.

Editorial rating per the methodology · confidence of the rating: medium · excluding market prices

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 5 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: CloverCumulative methane production over time for 5 records and the weighted mean of 394 m³ CH₄/t VS. 5 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).02004006000510152025303540time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSLehtomaki (2006) · 1: 280 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Lehtomaki (2006) · 2: 300 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Pouech (b.r.) · 1: 384 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Pouech (b.r.) · 2: 549 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Pouech (b.r.) · 3: 558 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean394

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (394); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
CH₄ in biogas
% vol., measured
TemperatureSampleCurve
Lehtomaki (2006) · 1280—35 °C · mesophilicRed cloverend point (model curve)
Lehtomaki (2006) · 2300—35 °C · mesophilicRed cloverend point (model curve)
Pouech (b.r.) · 138462.0 %40 °C · mesophilicCloverend point (model curve)
Pouech (b.r.) · 254958.3 %40 °C · mesophilicCloverend point (model curve)
Pouech (b.r.) · 355857.7 %40 °C · mesophilicCloverend point (model curve)
Weighted mean39459.3 %arithmetic mean 414, SD 133

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
19.4% (range 15.3–26.2)
Volatile solids (VS)
91.5 % DM (range 91.5–91.5)
Nitrogen
3.5 % DM
C/N ratio
12

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: CROPGEN D4); dry matter: 3 determinations, volatile solids: 1 determination.

Sources: Lehtomaki (2006); Pouech, P. Fruteau, H. Bewa, H.. Agricultural crops for….

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • seasonal
  • fibrous
  • nitrogen-rich
  • editorial classification

Advantages

  • Methane potential in the database: weighted mean 394 m³ CH₄/t VS (median 384; range 280-558; 5 records from 2 sources).

Drawbacks and risks

  • Large spread between records resulting from the cutting date and fraction: a BMP test is essential.
  • In a BMP test with lucerne and red clover (mono- and co-digestion with grass), at a high load (40 g VS/l) VFA and ammonia accumulated in the digestate, and the VS removal in mono-digestion of legumes was lower than 60% (Li et al. 2023).

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source dose limits; in studies on co-digestion of energy crops with cattle manure (Lehtomäki 2007), the effect of the crop:manure ratio was examined.

Practical requirements

  • Ensiling (Herrmann 2011: storage period and additives change the yield)

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Clover (genus Trifolium), above all red clover (meadow clover), is grown in Poland for feed, as a component of mixtures with grasses and as a preceding crop enriching the soil in nitrogen. The compilation contains records for red clover and for clover with no precise species identification, at different development stages: vegetative, budding and flowering. They come from several studies, under mesophilic conditions.

Properties relevant to digestion

Clover has a higher protein content than grasses and a lower ratio of C to N, and at the same time contains enough fibre. For this reason it is a good supplement to rations dominated by nitrogen-poor substrates, such as straw. Digestibility declines as the plant matures: at flowering the share of woody tissues is greater than at the vegetative stage. Ensiling clover is more difficult than ensiling grasses because of the high buffering capacity and lower sugar content, so wilting or the use of additives is often recommended. With a large protein share, the ammonia concentration must be controlled.

How to read the spread of results

The records compiled cover different development stages (vegetative, budding and flowering), which in itself explains part of the spread. In addition, varieties, the cutting date, the form of the material (fresh, ensiled, dried), the method of size reduction and the growing conditions differ. One of the studies has no publication year given in the source database, which is noted in the description. The tests were carried out at different substrate-to-inoculum ratios, so the results are not directly comparable.

In biogas plant practice

Clover is usually an auxiliary substrate, used on farms that have it in their crop rotation. It is best harvested at the stage before full flowering and ensiled in the standard way. It gives a good effect in a mixture with straw or maize silage, because it contributes nitrogen and makes it easier to maintain the C/N balance. Limitations are the variability of yield between years and competition from feed use. The dose is chosen on the basis of analysis and a BMP test. It is worth noting that clover is used in crop rotation mainly for agronomic benefits, so its value to the farm is not confined to biogas. In the profitability balance, savings on nitrogen fertilisation should also be included.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.091 d−1 was assumed (no kinetic data for the group – the median of all available rate constants k (93 values) was used).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Lehtomaki, A. Viinikainen, T.A. Rintala, J.A (2006). Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production. Submitted to Biomass and Bioenergy.
  2. Pouech, P. Fruteau, H. Bewa, H.. Agricultural crops for biogas production on anaerobic digestion plants. Biomass for energy and industry 163-165.

All sources of the site: bibliography.