
BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residues
Durian shells — BMP: 2 studies, weighted mean 93 m³ CH₄/t VS
Durian husks are a hard, fibrous waste from a tropical fruit with a large spread of results; they contain a lot of lignin and cellulose, and the yield depends on comminution.
Photo PattayaPatrol / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping
- Weighted mean
- 93m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 35–152m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 2studies
- Publications
- 2sources
- Temperatures
- —of the test
Methane in biogas
Low methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (protein from total nitrogen (N 0.7 % DM × 6.25)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants
Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 2 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (93); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhao et al. (2016) DOI | 152 | — | Durian (Durio zibethinus) – Shell | end point (model curve) |
| Muenmee i Prasertboonyai (2021) DOI | 35 | — | Durian shell | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 93 | arithmetic mean 93, SD 83 | ||
Typical composition
- Volatile solids (VS)
- 94.6 % DM (range 94.6–94.6)
- Nitrogen
- 0.7 % DM
- C/N ratio
- 59.9
Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: BCBPD); dry matter: 0 determinations, volatile solids: 1 determination. C/N was calculated as the ratio of C and N content (% DM) from the same source. No DM in the sources – the calculator has to ask for a value.
Sources: Zhao et al. (2016).
The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.
Process properties
Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.
Advantages
- Methane yield in the compendium: median 93 (range 35-152) m³ CH₄/t VS, 2 records from 2 studies (weighted mean 93).
- Durian husks were studied in mono- and co-digestion with food waste (Muenmee et al. (2021))
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
substrates: easily degradable — e.g. Maize silage (whole crop), Food waste, Sorghum, whole crop, Whey, Beet leaves and tops
In BMP studies, easily degradable substrates increased the yield of the mixture with slurry (synergy in some mixtures).[1]
Dosing
No source limits on the dose for this substrate.
Sources of the process data
- Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates
- Bio-energy conversion performance, biodegradability, and kinetic analysis of different fruit residues during discontinuous anaerobic digestion
- Potential Biogas Production Generated by Mono- and Co-digestion of Food Waste and Fruit Waste (Durian Shell, Dragon Fruit and Pineapple Peel) in Different Mixture Ratio under Anaerobic Condition
- Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition
- Effects of size and thermophilic pre-hydrolysis of banana peel during anaerobic digestion, and biomethanation potential of key tropical fruit wastes
- Effect of particle size on biogas generation from biomass residues
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Durian (Durio zibethinus) is a tropical fruit grown in South-East Asia, known for its strong smell. The edible part is a small fraction of the mass of the fruit, and most of it is husk (shell) and seeds. The husks end up as waste in markets and in processing. In Poland durian is an imported product that is rarely encountered, so the material is of comparative interest only.
Properties relevant to digestion
The durian husk is woody and fibrous. It consists mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, and its content of simple sugars is low. This structure makes hydrolysis slow, and without size reduction and pretreatment part of the material remains undigested. On the other hand, the risk of acidification is small. The low protein content means a high C/N ratio, so it combines well with nitrogenous materials such as manure or sludge. The spiny surface makes mechanical handling and feeding difficult.
How to read the spread of results
The dataset contains several records from several studies, and the spread is very large. One of the studies gives the result in the unit ml/g VS without explicit normalisation, and the samples differ in preparation, variety and the degree of ripeness of the fruit. Comminution (from coarse pieces to grinding), test length and inoculum also matter. For woody material, the test duration is particularly important, because slow decomposition may not be complete.
In biogas plant practice
Durian husks require grinding and, in industrial installations, also pretreatment (steam, chemical or biological) if the full energy value is to be exploited. Dosing in a mixture with rapidly degradable wastes stabilises the process. Storage is easier than for soft fruits, because the material is more durable, but in tropical conditions it also decomposes. Because of the discrepancies in results, a dedicated BMP test of the batch is recommended.
In practice it is considered that for such woody materials, the cost-effectiveness of pretreatment matters more than the result of a short test, because the cost of grinding or steam treatment may exceed the value of the additional biogas if the husks come from a distant source.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Zhao, C.; Yan, H.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Chen, C.; Liu, G. (2016). Bio-energy conversion performance, biodegradability, and kinetic analysis of different fruit residues during discontinuous anaerobic digestion. Waste Management 52, 295–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.028 DOI
- Muenmee, S.; Prasertboonyai, K. (2021). Potential Biogas Production Generated by Mono- and Co-digestion of Food Waste and Fruit Waste (Durian Shell, Dragon Fruit and Pineapple Peel) in Different Mixture Ratio under Anaerobic Condition. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 77(1), 25–35. DOI: 10.5755/j01.erem.77.1.25234 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





