BMP testingMunicipal and green waste, paper and textiles

Newspaper — BMP: 7 studies, weighted mean 81 m³ CH₄/t VS

Newsprint has a lot of lignin from mechanical pulp, so it digests poorly; only pretreatment improves degradation, and printing inks have little effect.

rating: neutralCH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo African Studies Centre Leiden / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
81m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
45–100m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
7studies
Publications
3sources
Temperatures
35 °C, 55 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it

Potential per tonne of fresh matter: low, but limited by the poor degradability of the organic matter (74 m³ CH₄/t); no particular threats to stability. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer, slow degradation.

Why? Rating factors

Potential per tonne 0

  • ±0potential 74 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 81 × DM 93.2 % × VS 97.8 %); low degradability of VS (BMP 81 m³ CH₄/t VS) — points capped

Process stability 0

  • 0no factors

Handling and costs −1

  • −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing
  • −0.5slow degradation — long retention time

Total points: −1 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.

Editorial rating per the methodology · confidence of the rating: medium · excluding market prices

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 7 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: NewspaperCumulative methane production over time for 7 records and the weighted mean of 81 m³ CH₄/t VS. 7 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).02550751001250510152025303540time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSTong et al. (1990): 92 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 1: 84 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 2: 100 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Krause et al. (2018) · 1: 45 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Krause et al. (2018) · 2: 60 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Krause et al. (2018) · 3: 62 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Krause et al. (2018) · 4: 70 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean81

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (81); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Tong et al. (1990) DOI9235 °C · mesophilicNews paper · pretreatment: air driedend point (model curve)
Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 1 DOI8435 °C · mesophilicunprinted (orig.: “unprinted newsPaper”): value quoted in a literature reviewend point (model curve)
Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 2 DOI10035 °C · mesophilicprinted (orig.: “printed newsPaper”): value quoted in a literature reviewend point (model curve)
Krause et al. (2018) · 1 DOI4535 °C · mesophilicnewspaperend point (model curve)
Krause et al. (2018) · 2 DOI6055 °C · thermophilicnewspaperend point (model curve)
Krause et al. (2018) · 3 DOI6235 °C · mesophilicnewspaperend point (model curve)
Krause et al. (2018) · 4 DOI7055 °C · thermophilicnewspaperend point (model curve)
Weighted mean81arithmetic mean 73, SD 20

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
93.2% (range 92.4–94)
Volatile solids (VS)
97.8 % DM (range 95.3–98)

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: CROPGEN D4, MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 4 determinations. Samples were tested dried/air-dry – the DM refers to the material in the test, not to fresh material.

Sources: Tong et al. (1990); Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997); Krause et al. (2018).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • fibrous
  • carbon-rich
  • low in nitrogen
  • slowly degrading
  • poor in trace elements
  • editorial classification

Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.

Advantages

  • Methane potential in the Substraty.pl BMP dataset: weighted mean 81.1 m³ CH₄/t VS (SD 19.6; 7 records, 3 sources).
  • Newsprint: a source of cellulose, no risk of ammonia or acidification (Hendriks and Zeeman 2009).

Drawbacks and risks

  • Lignin from mechanical pulp shields the cellulose.

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source threshold.

Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).

Practical requirements

  • Shred: shredding increases the surface available for degradation and speeds it up, but does not necessarily raise the final gas yield (FNR 2010, Ch. 3 “Triturado”).

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Newsprint is used for printing newspapers. It is made mainly from mechanical and groundwood pulps, often with an addition of waste paper. The fibres it contains are not chemically bleached, so they retain a considerable part of the lignin. After newspapers have circulated, waste paper arises and goes to recycling. The dataset contains newsprint samples, including unprinted and printed, tested under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.

Properties relevant to digestion

Lignin is the main limitation here: it shields cellulose and hemicelluloses from enzymes and does not undergo anaerobic degradation. The methane potential of newsprint is therefore markedly lower than that of office paper or board made of chemical fibres. The nitrogen and phosphorus content is very low, which further limits microbial activity in mono-digestion. Printing inks currently used in newspapers are mostly based on vegetable or mineral oils and are present in small amounts. Shredded paper forms a sticky mass.

How to read the spread of results

The spread is moderate, but should not come as a surprise. Newsprint differs in the share of secondary and mechanical fibres, thickness, moisture and degree of printing. The dataset contains unprinted and printed samples (cited in a review), which illustrates the effect of printing, mostly small. Beyond that, size reduction, temperature (mesophilic or thermophilic), the inoculum and nutrient additions, and the test length matter. In most records degradation did not reach a plateau.

In biogas plant practice

Newsprint is a poor substrate and there is no justification for planning a share of it in the mix; in practice it is sent for recycling. If it enters a plant as a contaminant of biowaste, it behaves like lignocellulosic material: it degrades slowly and may remain in the digestate. Size reduction and the addition of nutrients improve the result, but do not fundamentally change its low potential. As waste paper, paper is waste (group 15 or 20).

Compared with other grades of paper, newsprint is the most resistant, and the only way of improving it is pretreatment, e.g. steam or alkaline, which loosens the lignin bonds. On the scale of agricultural biogas plants, however, such solutions are rarely used because of cost.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.110 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Tong, X.; Smith, L.H.; McCarty, P.L. (1990). Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. Biomass 21(4), 239–255. DOI: 10.1016/0144-4565(90)90075-u DOI
  2. Nallathambi Gunaseelan, V. (1997). Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy 13(1-2), 83–114. DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(97)00020-2 DOI
  3. Krause, M.J.; Chickering, G.W.; Townsend, T.G.; Pullammanappallil, P. (2018). Effects of temperature and particle size on the biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste components. Waste Management 71, 25–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.015 DOI

All sources of the site: bibliography.