
BMP testingMunicipal and green waste, paper and textiles
Newspaper — BMP: 7 studies, weighted mean 81 m³ CH₄/t VS
Newsprint has a lot of lignin from mechanical pulp, so it digests poorly; only pretreatment improves degradation, and printing inks have little effect.
rating: neutralCH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)
Photo African Studies Centre Leiden / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC BY-SA 4.0, source file; changes: cropping
- Weighted mean
- 81m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 45–100m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 7studies
- Publications
- 3sources
- Temperatures
- 35 °C, 55 °Cof the test
Methane in biogas
Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it
Potential per tonne of fresh matter: low, but limited by the poor degradability of the organic matter (74 m³ CH₄/t); no particular threats to stability. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer, slow degradation.
Why? Rating factors
Potential per tonne 0
- ±0potential 74 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 81 × DM 93.2 % × VS 97.8 %); low degradability of VS (BMP 81 m³ CH₄/t VS) — points capped
Process stability 0
- 0no factors
Handling and costs −1
- −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing
- −0.5slow degradation — long retention time
Total points: −1 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 7 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (81); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tong et al. (1990) DOI | 92 | 35 °C · mesophilic | News paper · pretreatment: air dried | end point (model curve) |
| Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 1 DOI | 84 | 35 °C · mesophilic | unprinted (orig.: “unprinted newsPaper”): value quoted in a literature review | end point (model curve) |
| Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997) · 2 DOI | 100 | 35 °C · mesophilic | printed (orig.: “printed newsPaper”): value quoted in a literature review | end point (model curve) |
| Krause et al. (2018) · 1 DOI | 45 | 35 °C · mesophilic | newspaper | end point (model curve) |
| Krause et al. (2018) · 2 DOI | 60 | 55 °C · thermophilic | newspaper | end point (model curve) |
| Krause et al. (2018) · 3 DOI | 62 | 35 °C · mesophilic | newspaper | end point (model curve) |
| Krause et al. (2018) · 4 DOI | 70 | 55 °C · thermophilic | newspaper | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 81 | arithmetic mean 73, SD 20 | ||
Typical composition
- Dry matter (DM)
- 93.2% (range 92.4–94)
- Volatile solids (VS)
- 97.8 % DM (range 95.3–98)
Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: CROPGEN D4, MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 4 determinations. Samples were tested dried/air-dry – the DM refers to the material in the test, not to fresh material.
Sources: Tong et al. (1990); Nallathambi Gunaseelan (1997); Krause et al. (2018).
The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.
Process properties
Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.
Advantages
- Methane potential in the Substraty.pl BMP dataset: weighted mean 81.1 m³ CH₄/t VS (SD 19.6; 7 records, 3 sources).
- Newsprint: a source of cellulose, no risk of ammonia or acidification (Hendriks and Zeeman 2009).
Drawbacks and risks
- Lignin from mechanical pulp shields the cellulose.
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
substrates: high alkalinity (buffer) — e.g. Cattle manure, Pig slurry, Cattle slurry, Duck slurry, Rumen and digestive tract content
Dosing
No source threshold.
Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).
Practical requirements
- Shred: shredding increases the surface available for degradation and speeds it up, but does not necessarily raise the final gas yield (FNR 2010, Ch. 3 “Triturado”).
Sources of the process data
- Hagos et al. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: progress, challenges and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
- Weiland (2010). Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
- Hendriks, Zeeman (2009). Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol.
- FNR (2010). Guía sobre el Biogás – Desde la producción hasta el uso (hiszp. wydanie „Leitfaden Biogas”, GIZ 2013)
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Newsprint is used for printing newspapers. It is made mainly from mechanical and groundwood pulps, often with an addition of waste paper. The fibres it contains are not chemically bleached, so they retain a considerable part of the lignin. After newspapers have circulated, waste paper arises and goes to recycling. The dataset contains newsprint samples, including unprinted and printed, tested under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.
Properties relevant to digestion
Lignin is the main limitation here: it shields cellulose and hemicelluloses from enzymes and does not undergo anaerobic degradation. The methane potential of newsprint is therefore markedly lower than that of office paper or board made of chemical fibres. The nitrogen and phosphorus content is very low, which further limits microbial activity in mono-digestion. Printing inks currently used in newspapers are mostly based on vegetable or mineral oils and are present in small amounts. Shredded paper forms a sticky mass.
How to read the spread of results
The spread is moderate, but should not come as a surprise. Newsprint differs in the share of secondary and mechanical fibres, thickness, moisture and degree of printing. The dataset contains unprinted and printed samples (cited in a review), which illustrates the effect of printing, mostly small. Beyond that, size reduction, temperature (mesophilic or thermophilic), the inoculum and nutrient additions, and the test length matter. In most records degradation did not reach a plateau.
In biogas plant practice
Newsprint is a poor substrate and there is no justification for planning a share of it in the mix; in practice it is sent for recycling. If it enters a plant as a contaminant of biowaste, it behaves like lignocellulosic material: it degrades slowly and may remain in the digestate. Size reduction and the addition of nutrients improve the result, but do not fundamentally change its low potential. As waste paper, paper is waste (group 15 or 20).
Compared with other grades of paper, newsprint is the most resistant, and the only way of improving it is pretreatment, e.g. steam or alkaline, which loosens the lignin bonds. On the scale of agricultural biogas plants, however, such solutions are rarely used because of cost.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.110 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Tong, X.; Smith, L.H.; McCarty, P.L. (1990). Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. Biomass 21(4), 239–255. DOI: 10.1016/0144-4565(90)90075-u DOI
- Nallathambi Gunaseelan, V. (1997). Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy 13(1-2), 83–114. DOI: 10.1016/s0961-9534(97)00020-2 DOI
- Krause, M.J.; Chickering, G.W.; Townsend, T.G.; Pullammanappallil, P. (2018). Effects of temperature and particle size on the biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste components. Waste Management 71, 25–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.015 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





