BMP testingBy-products of the agri-food industry

Spent coffee grounds — BMP: 18 studies, weighted mean 262 m³ CH₄/t VS

Spent coffee grounds are used coffee from catering and the instant coffee industry, containing fat, lignin and caffeine; they digest well after size reduction and in a small share.

rating: neutralCH₄ ≈ 65 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo ПростоУчастник / Wikimedia Commons, licence CC0 1.0, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
262m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
110–413m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
18studies
Publications
3sources
Temperatures
37 °C, 38 °C, 58 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

High methane content · ≈ 6.5 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (protein from total nitrogen (N 2.8 % DM × 6.25); fat-rich (process classification)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it

Potential per tonne of fresh matter: moderate (40 m³ CH₄/t); process risk: fats, inhibitors, foaming. Handling costs: fibres, floating layer.

Why? Rating factors

Potential per tonne +1

  • +1potential 40 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 262 × DM 16 % × VS 95.7 %)

Process stability −1.75

  • −1fats: risk of accumulation of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), flotation and overloading
  • −0.5inhibitors: natural or residues (e.g. limonene, polyphenols, antibiotics, metals)
  • −0.25foaming: tendency to form foam in the digester

Handling and costs −0.5

  • −0.5fibres, floating layer — shredding and intensive mixing

Total points: −1.25 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.

Editorial rating per the methodology · confidence of the rating: medium · excluding market prices

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 18 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: Spent coffee groundsCumulative methane production over time for 18 records and the weighted mean of 262 m³ CH₄/t VS. 18 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).01002003004005000510152025303540time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSCazaudehore et al. (2021) · 1: 294 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Cazaudehore et al. (2021) · 2: 301 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 1: 127 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 2: 217 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 3: 252 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 4: 266 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 5: 311 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 6: 320 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 7: 322 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 8: 329 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 9: 336 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 10: 338 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 11: 350 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 12: 362 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 13: 370 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dias et al. (2023) · 14: 413 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Velasquez-Pinas et al. (2023) · 1: 110 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Velasquez-Pinas et al. (2023) · 2: 251 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean262

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (262); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

  • Show the remaining records in the legend (6)

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Cazaudehore et al. (2021) · 1 DOI29438 °C · mesophilicspent coffee · pretreatment: particle size reduction/sample preparation (MY-D: physical treatment)end point (model curve)
Cazaudehore et al. (2021) · 2 DOI30158 °C · thermophilicspent coffee · pretreatment: particle size reduction/sample preparation (MY-D: physical treatment)end point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 1 DOI12737 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 2 DOI21737 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 3 DOI25237 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 4 DOI26637 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 5 DOI31137 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 6 DOI32037 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 7 DOI32237 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 8 DOI32937 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 9 DOI33637 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 10 DOI33837 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 11 DOI35037 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 12 DOI36237 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 13 DOI37037 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Dias et al. (2023) · 14 DOI41337 °C · mesophilicindustrial spent coffee groundend point (model curve)
Velasquez-Pinas et al. (2023) · 1 DOI11037 °C · mesophilicground coffee wasteend point (model curve)
Velasquez-Pinas et al. (2023) · 2 DOI25137 °C · mesophilicdischard coffeeend point (model curve)
Weighted mean262arithmetic mean 293, SD 79

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
16% (range 6.3–97.2)
Volatile solids (VS)
95.7 % DM (range 95.1–96.3)
Nitrogen
2.8 % DM
C/N ratio
17.5

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 9 determinations, volatile solids: 2 determinations. C/N was calculated as the ratio of C and N content (% DM) from the same source. The DM range includes fresh samples as well as samples partly dried or dried before the test – for fresh material the lower part of the range applies, ideally your own measurement.

Sources: Cazaudehore et al. (2021); Dias et al. (2023); Velasquez-Pinas et al. (2023).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • fat-rich
  • fibrous
  • contains inhibitors
  • tendency to foam
  • editorial classification

Advantages

  • Methane potential in the Substraty.pl BMP set: weighted mean 262.0 m³ CH₄/t VS (SD 79.2; 18 records, 3 sources).
  • Spent coffee grounds have been studied for digestion as coffee waste (Lane 1983).
  • They contain fat, which raises the potential (Lane 1983; Long et al. 2012).

Drawbacks and risks

  • Fat may give LCFA at high loading (Long et al. 2012).
  • Caffeine and polyphenols may inhibit (Chen et al. 2008).
  • They mould quickly and require rapid use.

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source threshold. Low/medium dose, shredded; the share is limited by fat and inhibitors.

Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Spent coffee grounds are the residue after brewing coffee or extracting instant coffee. They arise in cafes, restaurants and offices, and on a large scale in plants producing instant coffee. In biogas plants they appear as a component of kitchen (catering) waste or as a separate, homogeneous batch from industry. Owing to the growth of coffee culture, the stream in Poland is noticeable, but dispersed.

Properties relevant to digestion

Spent coffee is a material containing fat (a few per cent of dry matter), hemicellulose (mannans, galactans), cellulose, lignin and protein. Thanks to the lipid content the gas potential is high, but the risk is the accumulation of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) at a high load. The grounds also contain caffeine, tannins and polyphenols, which can affect microorganisms, although at typical shares they do not block the process. The fibrous structure includes a fraction that is hard to degrade, so degradation is slower than for sugars. Fresh grounds are moist and quickly go mouldy.

How to read the spread of results

The dataset contains several records from several sources, including mesophilic (37-38 °C) and thermophilic (approx. 58 °C) studies. The spread results from the origin of the grounds (brewed coffee, industrial extract), the species and degree of roasting of the beans, whether the grounds were defatted, and also from size reduction, drying of the samples, the test conditions and the inoculum. In one study industrial grounds were tested under different test conditions, which in itself creates variability.

In biogas plant practice

Spent coffee grounds are used as an additive in co-digestion in a small share, best with slurry or sludge, which bring buffering and trace elements. Dosing should be stable, because a sudden increase in the lipid load can disturb the process. Fresh grounds are not stored for long. Catering waste requires compliance with the regulations on kitchen waste and, if it is mixed with products of animal origin, also with veterinary regulations.

For a full assessment of a batch it is worth checking the fat and dry matter content, because grounds from the instant coffee industry, after extraction with hot water, have a different composition from grounds from espresso machines in cafes, which contain more residual fat and are moister.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.091 d−1 was assumed (no kinetic data for the group – the median of all available rate constants k (93 values) was used).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Cazaudehore, G.; Monlau, F.; Gassie, C.; Lallement, A.; Guyoneaud, R. (2021). Methane production and active microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of three commercial biodegradable coffee capsules under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Science of The Total Environment 784, 146972. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146972 DOI
  2. Dias, M.; Takeda, P.; Fuess, L.; Tommaso, G. (2023). Inoculum-to-substrate ratio and solid content effects over in natura spent coffee grounds anaerobic digestion. Journal of Environmental Management 325, 116486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116486 DOI
  3. Velasquez-Pinas, J.A.; Ampese, L.C.; Di Domenico Ziero, H.; Radis Steinmetz, R.L.; Belt, C.; Forster-Carneiro, T. (2023). Circular bioeconomy of coffee industries: Energy and techno-economic approach based on biogas and biomethane production. Journal of Cleaner Production 418, 138045. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138045 DOI

All sources of the site: bibliography.