BMP testingFruit, vegetables and their residues

Pumpkin — BMP: 7 studies, weighted mean 341 m³ CH₄/t VS

Pumpkin and its waste (flesh, spoiled fruit, processing residues) is a watery substrate rich in sugars and starch, readily fermentable and requiring size reduction of seeds and skin.

rating: neutralCH₄ ≈ 52 % (estimate)

Published Updated 3 min readFeedstockData Editorial Team

Photo George Chernilevsky / Wikimedia Commons, public domain, source file; changes: cropping

Weighted mean
341m³ CH₄/t VS
Range
199–478m³ CH₄/t VS
Records
7studies
Publications
3sources
Temperatures
38 °Cof the test

Methane in biogas

Medium methane content · ≈ 5.2 kWh/m³ of biogas

estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (carbohydrate-dominated (no protein or fat characteristics)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.

How we calculate it and what the zones mean

Rating for biogas plants

neutral — editorial rating for biogas plantsNo clear advantages — worth charging a fee for accepting it

Potential per tonne of fresh matter: moderate (28 m³ CH₄/t); process risk: acidification. No additional handling requirements.

Why? Rating factors

Potential per tonne +1

  • +1potential 28 m³ CH₄/t fresh matter (BMP 341 × DM 10.8 % × VS 76.8 %)

Process stability −1

  • −1acidification: rapid degradation / acidic pH, risk of VFA accumulation, needs buffering

Handling and costs 0

  • 0no factors

Total points: 0 · thresholds: ≥ 2.5 very good, ≥ 1 good, below — neutral; negative with cumulative process risk.

Editorial rating per the methodology · confidence of the rating: medium · excluding market prices

Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data

BMP curves from 7 studies

Weighted mean Individual records

BMP curves: PumpkinCumulative methane production over time for 7 records and the weighted mean of 341 m³ CH₄/t VS. 7 of the curves are model curves (first-order kinetics).0200400600051015202530time [d]m³ CH₄/t VSDubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 1: 391 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 2: 397 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 3: 421 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 4: 478 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Kolbl et al. (2014) · 1: 366 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Kolbl et al. (2014) · 2: 436 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)Czubaszek et al. (2022): 199 m³ CH₄/t VS (model curve)mean341

Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.

Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (341); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.

Records and sources

Download CSV
SourceBMP
m³ CH₄/t VS
TemperatureSampleCurve
Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 139138 °C · mesophilicPumpkin biomass, bioreactor R3end point (model curve)
Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 239738 °C · mesophilicPumpkin biomass, bioreactor R4end point (model curve)
Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 342138 °C · mesophilicPumpkin biomass, bioreactor R5end point (model curve)
Dubrovskis i Plume (2017) · 447838 °C · mesophilicPumpkin biomass, bioreactor R2end point (model curve)
Kolbl et al. (2014) · 1 DOI36638 °C · mesophilicMuscate Pumpkinend point (model curve)
Kolbl et al. (2014) · 2 DOI43638 °C · mesophilicRotten Pumpkinend point (model curve)
Czubaszek et al. (2022) DOI199—Pumpkin residueend point (model curve)
Weighted mean341arithmetic mean 384, SD 89

Typical composition

Dry matter (DM)
10.8% (range 9.5–12.1)
Volatile solids (VS)
76.8 % DM (range 69.5–84)

Median and range of the determinations reported in the publications behind this substrate's BMP records (read from: MY-D); dry matter: 2 determinations, volatile solids: 2 determinations.

Sources: Kolbl et al. (2014).

The composition of the raw material varies between batches — for plant calculations use an analysis of your own sample. The calculator inserts typical values automatically.

Process properties

  • easily degradable
  • acidic
  • dilutes the feed (low DM)
  • seasonal
  • poor in trace elements
  • carbon-rich
  • low in nitrogen
  • editorial classification

Advantages

  • Methane yield in the compendium: median 397 (range 199-478) m³ CH₄/t VS, 7 records from 3 studies (weighted mean 341).
  • Waste of pumpkin, courgette and apples was studied in one compilation as biogas substrates (Dubrovskis et al.) (Dubrovskis et al. (2017))

Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for

Dosing

No source limits on the dose for this substrate.

Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).

The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.

What it is and where it comes from

Pumpkin (Cucurbita) is grown for preserves, as an ornamental pumpkin and as a food. Waste arises on farms, in sorting plants and in processing plants, and after the autumn season also as unsold fruit and decorations. The compilation contains several records from several studies: pumpkin fruit waste tested in several reactors, butternut squash and spoiled pumpkin, and also pumpkin residues from a Polish study, under mesophilic conditions (in one study the temperature was not stated).

Properties relevant to digestion

Pumpkin flesh contains a lot of water, sugars and starch and little protein and fibre, so it is readily and quickly fermentable. The skin is harder and more fibrous, and the seeds contain fat and protein, which changes the character of digestion. Large, hard parts must be size-reduced, because otherwise they degrade slowly. Like other fruit and vegetables, pumpkin at a large dose can cause rapid acidification, particularly in mono-digestion, and the low nitrogen level argues for co-digestion with slurry. Spoiled fruit is more microbiologically active and may contain moulds.

How to read the spread of results

The records concern different materials: fruit waste, butternut squash, spoiled pumpkin and processing residues. The species and variety (giant, butternut, common pumpkin), the degree of ripeness and spoilage, the presence of skin and seeds and size reduction all matter. The series from reactors of a single study are replicates or variants of the same experiment, so they are not independent. There are also differences in the inoculum, the substrate-to-inoculum ratio and test length.

In biogas plant practice

Pumpkin is a seasonal and local substrate, suitable as a supplement to the mix in the autumn period. It requires washing or separation of soil, size reduction (including seeds and skin) and careful dosing with control of pH and volatile fatty acids. Ensiling in a mixture with drier material is suitable for storage. As agricultural or food waste it is subject to requirements arising from the installation's permit. The yield of a specific batch is confirmed by a BMP test. It is worth remembering that ornamental pumpkins after the season may contain contaminants such as paints, waxes or decorative elements. Such batches should be carefully inspected and cleaned before they reach the shredder, so as not to introduce foreign substances into the digester.

Methodology in brief

BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.

Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.245 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).

The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.

Full methodology and correction policy

Bibliography

  1. Dubrovskis, V.; Plume, I. (2017). Biogas from wastes of pumpkin, marrow and apple. Agronomy Research 15(1), 69–78. https://agronomy.emu.ee/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Vol15Nr1_Dubrovskis.pdf source
  2. Kolbl, S.; Paloczi, A.; Panjan, J.; Stres, B. (2014). Addressing case specific biogas plant tasks: Industry oriented methane yields derived from 5L Automatic Methane Potential Test Systems in batch or semi-continuous tests using realistic inocula, substrate particle sizes and organic loading. Bioresource Technology 153, 180–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.010 DOI
  3. Czubaszek, R.; Wysocka-Czubaszek, A.; Tyborowski, R. (2022). Methane Production Potential from Apple Pomace, Cabbage Leaves, Pumpkin Residue and Walnut Husks. Applied Sciences 12(12), 6128. DOI: 10.3390/app12126128 DOI

All sources of the site: bibliography.