
BMP testingAlgae and aquatic plants
Chlorella kessleri — BMP: 2 studies, weighted mean 193 m³ CH₄/t VS
Chlorella kessleri (now Parachlorella kessleri) is a green freshwater alga with a rigid wall, the treatment of which affects the availability of the cells for digestion.
Illustration: FeedstockData (AI, Google Gemini)
- Weighted mean
- 193m³ CH₄/t VS
- Range
- 168–218m³ CH₄/t VS
- Records
- 2studies
- Publications
- 2sources
- Temperatures
- 38 °Cof the test
Methane in biogas
Medium methane content · ≈ 5.8 kWh/m³ of biogas
estimate from the substrate type The collected studies contain no measurement. The interval follows from the approximate composition (protein-rich (process classification)) and the yields of compound groups according to FNR.
Rating for biogas plants
not rated — editorial rating for biogas plants
Not rated: no dry matter or volatile solids in the data. We calculate the rating when the dry matter and volatile solids of the material are known.
Add to the co-digestion calculator CSV data
BMP curves from 2 studies
Weighted mean Individual records
Dashed lines are a model curve (first-order kinetics, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt)); the end point comes from the publication. All curves are model curves.
Cumulative methane production over the test [m³ CH₄/t VS]. The thick line is the weighted mean of all records (193); dots mark the end values given in the publications. Point at the chart to read values; click a legend item to hide or show a record.
Records and sources
Download CSV| Source | BMP m³ CH₄/t VS | Temperature | Sample | Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jankowska et al. (2017) DOI | 168 | 38 °C · mesophilic | (orig.: “Chlorella kessleri”): value quoted in a literature review · pretreatment: particle size reduction/sample preparation (MY-D: physical treatment) | end point (model curve) |
| Mussgnug et al. (2010) DOI | 218 | 38 °C · mesophilic | Chlorella kessleri | end point (model curve) |
| Weighted mean | 193 | arithmetic mean 193, SD 35 | ||
Process properties
Low confidence: the description is based on general characteristics of the substrate group, not on studies of this material. Treat it as a hint to be verified.
Advantages
- Methane yield in the compendium: median 193 (range 168-218) m³ CH₄/t VS, 2 records from 2 studies (weighted mean 193).
Drawbacks and risks
- The high protein content of the cells causes release of ammonia, which can be toxic to the process (Sialve et al. (2009); Rajagopal et al. (2013))
Co-digestion — what to combine it with, what to watch out for
- combines well
substrates: carbon-rich — e.g. Wheat straw, Maize silage (whole crop), Cereal straw (unspecified), Willow (short rotation), Cardboard and paperboard
The low C/N of algal sludge was balanced by the addition of paper: 50-60% VS of paper increased the rate of methane production, optimum C/N 20-25.[1][2]
- caution
substrates: nitrogen-rich — e.g. Pig slurry, Poultry manure, Waste activated sludge (secondary sludge), Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis salina
Algal protein releases ammonia; additional nitrogen sources increase the risk of ammonia inhibition.[2][3]
Dosing
No source limits on the dose for this substrate.
Introduce gradually, starting with a small dose and monitoring the process (e.g. FOS/TAC, pH, gas composition).
Practical requirements
- Do not dry the biomass before feeding: drying lowered biogas production to about 80% (Mussgnug et al. (2010))
- Monitor ammonia (high protein) and, for marine species, sodium (Sialve et al. (2009))
Sources of the process data
- Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane
- Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable
- A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia
- Biogas from microalgae: Review on microalgae's cultivation, harvesting and pretreatment for anaerobic digestion
- Microalgae as substrates for fermentative biogas production in a combined biorefinery concept
The co-digestion calculator will assess a specific mixture containing this substrate.
What it is and where it comes from
Chlorella kessleri, now referred to as Parachlorella kessleri, is a unicellular green freshwater alga. It is studied as a source of lipids, protein and biomass for biofuels, and in laboratory studies it is grown in photobioreactors or tanks. It is not a commercial substrate for biogas plants, and the BMP data come from scientific papers, of which one value is quoted in a review.
Properties relevant to digestion
Chlorella cells have a rigid cell wall with layers built of polysaccharides, and in some strains also of a resistant biopolymer of the algaenan type. Such a wall limits access of enzymes to the interior of the cell, so disruption of the cells (mechanical, thermal or enzymatic) usually improves the digestion result. Protein predominates in the dry matter, followed by carbohydrates and lipids, and the proportions depend on the growing conditions. A low C/N ratio means a risk of ammonia, particularly when digesting algal biomass alone at a high load. The ash content can be elevated in cultures in mineral media.
How to read the spread of results
Records coming from different sources differ in the strain and the method of cultivation, and also in the form of the sample: fresh suspension, centrifuged or dried biomass. The composition of algae depends strongly on the growth phase and on the presence of nitrogen in the medium: nitrogen-deficient cultures contain more lipids and starch and less protein, which increases the methane potential. Disruption of the cell wall, temperature, test duration and adaptation of the inoculum also have an effect. Values quoted in reviews do not always have a full description of conditions.
In biogas plant practice
Chlorella kessleri is not used in agricultural biogas plants. It has practical significance for concepts in which algal biomass is obtained as a by-product of wastewater treatment or of a biorefinery. In such a case it is worth digesting it together with a substrate of low nitrogen content (for example straw, or waste rich in carbohydrates) in order to balance the C/N ratio. Cell disruption improves conversion, but increases the energy cost. Legal requirements depend on the origin of the biomass, including whether it arose in a wastewater treatment plant.
For plant designers it is also important that the cost of producing algal biomass is many times higher than the cost of typical agricultural substrates. Methane fermentation therefore makes sense mainly as a way of utilising residues or biomass from wastewater treatment, not as an end in itself.
Methodology in brief
BMP is the amount of methane obtained from volatile solids (VS) in a batch test, given in m³ CH₄ per tonne of VS (numerically the same as NmL CH₄/g VS in the publications) and converted to normal conditions (0 °C, 101.325 kPa). The weighted mean gives each publication a total weight of 1, split equally between its results for the substrate — a paper testing twenty varieties does not outweigh a paper with a single sample. In inter-laboratory programmes the unit is the laboratory (total weight 1), and within it the weight of a test grows with the number of bottles (replicates). Results after pretreatment (e.g. thermal, chemical, enzymatic) are shown separately and are not included in the mean.
Solid lines are curves measured in the tests. Where a publication gives only the final result, we draw a first-order kinetic model, B(t) = B₀·(1 − e−kt): only the end point comes from the publication, and the shape of the curve serves purely as visualisation — do not read the production on a particular day from it. For this substrate k = 0.102 d−1 was assumed (median of rate constants k reported in the sources and/or fitted to the mean measured curves).
The statistics describe the spread of published results — a descriptive compilation, not a meta-analysis or a guarantee of plant yield.
Bibliography
- Jankowska, E.; Sahu, A.K.; Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. (2017). Biogas from microalgae: Review on microalgae's cultivation, harvesting and pretreatment for anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 75, 692–709. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.045 DOI
- Mussgnug, J.; Klassen, V.; Schlüter, A.; Kruse, O. (2010). Microalgae as substrates for fermentative biogas production in a combined biorefinery concept. Journal of Biotechnology 150(1), 51–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.07.030 DOI
All sources of the site: bibliography.





